<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Palin Performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tapsns.com/blog/index.php/2008/09/the-palin-performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tapsns.com/blog/index.php/2008/09/the-palin-performance/</link>
	<description>Mark Anderson Strategic News Service</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 14:38:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.tapsns.com/blog/index.php/2008/09/the-palin-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-462</link>
		<dc:creator>mark anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 00:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tapsns.com/blog/?p=214#comment-462</guid>
		<description>Hans writes in the way that many of my serious technology members, generally Bush supporters, have written to me in the past.  I appreciate your kind comments about technology and business, and all I can say are two things regarding the political sphere: first, I am sorry if my writing causes anyone pain or anguish, that is definitely not the intention; and, second, my track record has been quite good on political figures and movements.  

As for Ms. Palin, the points made here literally moments after her launch on the international stage, have now been affirmed by intervening speeches, analysis, and her most recent interview (her first) with Charles Gibson.

Whether or not you like Sarah and her techniques, I think everything I&#039;ve written here stands up very well.  But I appreciate your comments, and again, because politics somehow involves emotions in a way that business and technology do not, please accept my apologies for any pain that these comments incur.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hans writes in the way that many of my serious technology members, generally Bush supporters, have written to me in the past.  I appreciate your kind comments about technology and business, and all I can say are two things regarding the political sphere: first, I am sorry if my writing causes anyone pain or anguish, that is definitely not the intention; and, second, my track record has been quite good on political figures and movements.  </p>
<p>As for Ms. Palin, the points made here literally moments after her launch on the international stage, have now been affirmed by intervening speeches, analysis, and her most recent interview (her first) with Charles Gibson.</p>
<p>Whether or not you like Sarah and her techniques, I think everything I&#8217;ve written here stands up very well.  But I appreciate your comments, and again, because politics somehow involves emotions in a way that business and technology do not, please accept my apologies for any pain that these comments incur.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans Brechbuhl</title>
		<link>http://www.tapsns.com/blog/index.php/2008/09/the-palin-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-460</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans Brechbuhl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 21:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tapsns.com/blog/?p=214#comment-460</guid>
		<description>Mark, you are spectacular on technology and business issues -- probably the best there is. I think it&#039;s too bad that you&#039;ve decided to get political instead -- a real loss.
Hans</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, you are spectacular on technology and business issues &#8212; probably the best there is. I think it&#8217;s too bad that you&#8217;ve decided to get political instead &#8212; a real loss.<br />
Hans</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boo</title>
		<link>http://www.tapsns.com/blog/index.php/2008/09/the-palin-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-451</link>
		<dc:creator>Boo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 21:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tapsns.com/blog/?p=214#comment-451</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your astute synopsis of what is happening before our very eyes! I Googled 
&quot;the Palin performance&quot; and got 1,690,000 hits!
Thankfully your message was right there near the top.  I am very afraid.  Palin&#039;s calculated aren&#039;t-I-adorable demeanor and her self-satisfied smugness are oh so difficult to watch. But when you add the vitally important fact that most of what she says is not true, it&#039;s sometimes unbearable, painful to watch.  I want a bullhorn to the world, so I can scream &quot;Don&#039;t let them fool you! The emperor has on no clothes!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your astute synopsis of what is happening before our very eyes! I Googled<br />
&#8220;the Palin performance&#8221; and got 1,690,000 hits!<br />
Thankfully your message was right there near the top.  I am very afraid.  Palin&#8217;s calculated aren&#8217;t-I-adorable demeanor and her self-satisfied smugness are oh so difficult to watch. But when you add the vitally important fact that most of what she says is not true, it&#8217;s sometimes unbearable, painful to watch.  I want a bullhorn to the world, so I can scream &#8220;Don&#8217;t let them fool you! The emperor has on no clothes!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kai De Altin</title>
		<link>http://www.tapsns.com/blog/index.php/2008/09/the-palin-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-441</link>
		<dc:creator>Kai De Altin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tapsns.com/blog/?p=214#comment-441</guid>
		<description>Mark, I hope hope that we do not see a repetition of the 1999 mistakes. Do not underestimate the opponent. 
Kai</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, I hope hope that we do not see a repetition of the 1999 mistakes. Do not underestimate the opponent.<br />
Kai</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: albert a. hamilton</title>
		<link>http://www.tapsns.com/blog/index.php/2008/09/the-palin-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-433</link>
		<dc:creator>albert a. hamilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 22:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tapsns.com/blog/?p=214#comment-433</guid>
		<description>Right on Mark! I am glad someone in the media did their homework.  Albert</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on Mark! I am glad someone in the media did their homework.  Albert</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.tapsns.com/blog/index.php/2008/09/the-palin-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 18:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tapsns.com/blog/?p=214#comment-429</guid>
		<description>As many commentators have pointed out, her speech was aimed soley at the hard-right base of the Republican party. McCain was already winning in that group by 80  percent. The problem with turning this into a base election is that this year, the Democratic base is much larger than the Republican base. If it&#039;s a base-based election, the Democrats win easily. McCain and his advisors must know this, so all I can figure is that they hope to make it close by energizing the religious right, get them to the polls, and deny Obama a fillibuster-proof Senate majority, which otherwise looks very reachable. Otherwise, this move, and the lack of reaching out to Independents and disaffected Democrats makes no sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As many commentators have pointed out, her speech was aimed soley at the hard-right base of the Republican party. McCain was already winning in that group by 80  percent. The problem with turning this into a base election is that this year, the Democratic base is much larger than the Republican base. If it&#8217;s a base-based election, the Democrats win easily. McCain and his advisors must know this, so all I can figure is that they hope to make it close by energizing the religious right, get them to the polls, and deny Obama a fillibuster-proof Senate majority, which otherwise looks very reachable. Otherwise, this move, and the lack of reaching out to Independents and disaffected Democrats makes no sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

